Cline vs Roo Code: Which Open-Source VS Code Agent Is Better?

An in-depth comparison of the two most popular open-source VS Code AI Agent plugins: features, model support, pricing models, and China accessibility.

Published 2026-02-16 ⚠️ Content may be outdated. Please verify with official sources.

Cline and Roo Code are the two highest-download open-source AI Agent plugins on the VS Code Marketplace. They share key characteristics: fully open-source, support for custom model APIs, and compatibility with any VS Code environment. This article provides a detailed comparison.

One-Sentence Summary

  • Cline: More stable and conservative — ideal for production use
  • Roo Code: More aggressive with more features — ideal for users who like to explore the cutting edge

Basic Information

ItemClineRoo Code
LicenseApache 2.0Apache 2.0
GitHub Stars~30k+~15k+
VS Code Downloads5M+1M+
OriginIndependent projectCline Fork
Maintenance TeamCline Inc.Community-driven

Roo Code originally started as a fork of Cline, but has since developed a substantial set of unique features.


Feature Comparison

Core Agent Capabilities

Both support:

  • Multi-file autonomous editing
  • Terminal command execution
  • Browser automation
  • MCP tool integration
  • Task planning and execution

Roo Code Exclusive Features

  • Multiple Modes: Configure different system prompts and models for different tasks (coding, architecture, Q&A)
  • Boomerang Tasks (Orchestrator Mode): The main agent can break down sub-tasks and dispatch sub-agents to execute them in parallel
  • More Aggressive Auto-Approval: Configurable auto-approval rules for more operations, reducing the number of manual confirmations

Cline Exclusive Advantages

  • More stable task execution (better error recovery)
  • More conservative permission controls (each operation requires confirmation by default)
  • Better context compression strategies
  • Maintained by the official team, ensuring consistent updates

Model Support

Both support:

  • OpenAI API (GPT-4o, o3, etc.)
  • Anthropic API (Claude Sonnet 4.5, Opus 4.6)
  • Google Gemini
  • DeepSeek, Qwen, and other Chinese-developed models
  • OpenAI-compatible endpoints (Ollama, Volcengine Ark, SiliconFlow, etc.)
  • Azure OpenAI

Recommended for users in China: Pair with the Volcengine Ark Coding Plan (plan details) — Lite starts at 9.9 CNY first month (renews at 40 CNY) with generous request quotas and full domestic accessibility.


Pricing Model

Both plugins are free to use; costs come from API usage:

OptionCostNotes
Anthropic Claude API$15-75/million tokensOfficial API, highest quality
Volcengine Ark Coding Plan40-200 CNY/month (first month 9.9-49.9 promo)Recommended in China, usage-based billing
SiliconFlowPer-token pricingSupports DeepSeek and others
Ollama (local)FreeRequires a local GPU

Learning Curve

ItemClineRoo Code
Initial SetupEasyEasy
Feature ExplorationModerateComplex
Community DocumentationComprehensiveAverage

China Accessibility

Both support connecting to domestic API providers. When paired with services like Volcengine Ark, they work entirely without a proxy.


Recommendations

Choose Cline if you:

  • Are new to AI Agent-assisted coding
  • Value stability and controllability
  • Use it in a team collaboration setting
  • Want clear official support backing

Choose Roo Code if you:

  • Are already familiar with Cline and want more features
  • Need Orchestrator / multi-agent mode
  • Enjoy trying the latest features
  • Are willing to accept occasional instability

Overall Scores

DimensionClineRoo Code
Feature Richness8/109/10
Stability9/107/10
Ease of Use8.5/107/10
China Experience8/108/10
Value for Money9/109/10

Both are excellent open-source tools. We recommend starting with Cline to learn the AI Agent workflow, then exploring Roo Code’s advanced features once you’re comfortable.

🔧 Tools in This Article

💡 Recommended Plans

Ready to pick your tool?

Check the full overview and find your perfect AI coding setup in 30 seconds.

View Full Overview →

📖 Related Articles

📚 Related Guides