Coding Plan vs Agent Plan vs Token Plan: 2026 China AI Subscription Showdown
A full comparison of Ark Agent Plan, MiniMax Token Plan, and Bailian Token Plan (Team) — pricing, billing units, model lineups, modality coverage, Harness tools, and how to choose.
In the first half of 2026, China’s AI coding subscription market split into clearly different product shapes. What used to be a fairly uniform “Coding Plan” category got pulled in three different directions:
- Volcano Ark Agent Plan (launched 2026-05-11): coding + multimodal + Harness tooling, AFP credits
- MiniMax Token Plan (upgraded from Coding Plan on 2026-03-23): all-modal (text/image/video/voice/music)
- Bailian Token Plan Team Edition: multi-seat + multi-model + text/image
All three are “more than just a Coding Plan”, but they’re optimizing for different things. This piece compares them head-to-head so you can decide which one fits.
TL;DR
| Product | Positioning | Entry price |
|---|---|---|
| Ark Agent Plan | Doubao full-stack + Harness toolchain Agent bundle | ¥40/mo |
| MiniMax Token Plan | World’s first all-modal subscription, includes video & music | ¥29/mo |
| Bailian Token Plan (Team) | Team / enterprise multi-seat, broadest model lineup | ¥198/mo |
Need Doubao + image/video + Agent toolchain → Ark Agent Plan. Need audio/video/music multimodal → MiniMax Token Plan. Team collaboration + data compliance → Bailian Token Plan (Team).
Pricing & Tiers
| Vendor | Entry | Mid | High | Top |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ark Agent Plan | Small ¥40 | Medium ¥200 | Large ¥500 | Max ¥1000 |
| MiniMax Token Plan | Starter ¥29 | Plus ¥49 | Max ¥119 | Ultra (High-Speed) ¥899 |
| Bailian Token Plan (Team) | Standard ¥198 | Premium ¥698 | Enterprise ¥1398 | ¥5,000 shared pack |
Takeaways:
- Lowest budget: MiniMax at ¥29 (also the smallest quota)
- Lowest entry with full bundle: Ark at ¥40 — slightly more than MiniMax but bundles richer models/tools
- Most expensive, broadest models: Bailian Team edition starts at ¥198, targeted at teams/enterprises
Billing Units
This is the easiest place to get confused and the most important difference:
| Product | Unit | Refresh mechanism | When exhausted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ark Agent Plan | AFP (Agent Fuel Points) | Daily 00:00 release + 5h rolling window | Wait for next window or upgrade |
| MiniMax Token Plan | request (M2.7 calls) | 5h rolling window + per-day multimodal quotas | Wait for next window |
| Bailian Token Plan (Team) | Credits (weighted by model) | Monthly total + shared pack for overage | Upgrade or buy shared pack |
Interpretation:
- Ark’s AFP rolls token volume, model tier and long-context multipliers into one fuel unit — long prompts burn fast (7.5× multiplier above 128k context)
- MiniMax’s request is roughly 1 M2.7 call, simple and intuitive, but multimodal quotas are tracked per day separately
- Bailian’s Credits scale with token usage and are uniform across models — easiest for enterprise budgeting
Model Lineups
Ark Agent Plan (6 models)
| Type | Model |
|---|---|
| Coding | Doubao-Seed |
| Video gen | Doubao-Seedance |
| Image gen | Doubao-Seedream |
| Multimodal embedding | Doubao-embedding-vision |
| Third-party | GLM-5.1, Kimi-K2.6 |
MiniMax Token Plan (6 models)
| Type | Model |
|---|---|
| Coding | MiniMax-M2.7 / M2.7 High-Speed |
| Video | Hailuo Video |
| Voice | Speech 2.8 |
| Image | Image-01 |
| Music | Music-2.6 (100 free/day) |
Bailian Token Plan Team (14 models)
| Type | Model |
|---|---|
| Coding / general | qwen3.6-plus, qwen3.6-flash |
| Reasoning | deepseek-v4-pro, deepseek-v4-flash, deepseek-v3.2 |
| Third-party | kimi-k2.6, kimi-k2.5, glm-5.1, glm-5, MiniMax-M2.5 |
| Image | qwen-image-2.0, qwen-image-2.0-pro, wan2.7-image, wan2.7-image-pro |
Verdict: Bailian has the widest catalogue, Ark bets on its own Doubao stack, and MiniMax is the only one with both music and video.
Modality Coverage
| Ark Agent Plan | MiniMax Token Plan | Bailian Team | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Text / code | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Image generation | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Image understanding | ✅ (embedding-vision) | — | ✅ (qwen-image) |
| Video generation | ✅ (Seedance) | ✅ (Hailuo) | — |
| Voice | — | ✅ (Speech 2.8) | — |
| Music | — | ✅ (Music-2.6) | — |
| Vector / Embedding | ✅ | — | ✅ |
MiniMax is the only one with music + voice. Bailian is the only one without video. Ark covers image/video/embedding but no audio yet.
Harness / Agent Tooling
| Capability | Ark Agent Plan | MiniMax | Bailian Team |
|---|---|---|---|
| Web search | ✅ (shared with Doubao) | — | — |
| Built-in memory | ✅ (embedding) | — | — |
| Auto routing | ✅ | — | — |
| Multi-seat | — | — | ✅ |
| Shared usage pack | — | — | ✅ |
| No-train-on-data commitment | — | — | ✅ |
| 24/7 AI companion | ✅ (Medium+) | — | — |
Ark Agent Plan’s real moat is its Harness toolchain — it bundles search, memory and Auto routing that you’d otherwise have to glue together yourself. Bailian Team’s moat is organizational — seats, shared packs, compliance. MiniMax doesn’t differentiate on Agent orchestration; its strength is modality breadth.
Client Compatibility
| Client | Ark Agent Plan | MiniMax | Bailian Team |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| OpenCode | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Trae | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ (via Qwen Code etc.) |
| OpenClaw | ✅ | — | ✅ |
| Hermes Agent | ✅ | — | ✅ |
| Cline | — | ✅ | ✅ |
| Codex CLI | — | ✅ | ✅ |
| Cursor | — | ✅ | ✅ |
Ark Agent Plan leans toward Agent frameworks (OpenClaw, Hermes), while MiniMax / Bailian cover open-source IDE plugins (Cline, Cursor) more widely.
Decision Tree
What's your primary use case?
├─ Pure text / code coding
│ ├─ Solo dev on a budget → Ark Coding Plan (Lite ¥40/mo, ¥9.9 first month, not in this matchup)
│ └─ Team needing compliance → Bailian Token Plan Team (¥198+)
│
├─ Coding + image/video generation (multimodal Agent)
│ ├─ Want Doubao + Agent toolchain → Ark Agent Plan
│ └─ Want Hailuo video / MiniMax music → MiniMax Token Plan
│
├─ Coding + voice / music
│ └─ MiniMax Token Plan (the only choice)
│
└─ Multi-user team + mixed models
└─ Bailian Token Plan (Team)
Unit Price Estimate
Rough ¥/¥1000-unit comparison at the entry tier (indicative — real cost depends on model & context):
| Product | Entry price | Nominal quota | ¥ / 1,000 units |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ark Agent Plan Small | ¥40 | 20,000 AFP | ~¥2 / 1,000 AFP |
| MiniMax Token Plan Starter | ¥29 | 600 req/5h (≈ 18,000/mo) | ~¥1.6 / 1,000 req |
| Bailian Token Plan Standard | ¥198 | 25,000 Credits | ~¥8 / 1,000 Credits |
Warning: AFP / request / Credit are not directly comparable. Ark AFP is blown up by the 7.5× long-context multiplier; Bailian Credits scale with token weighting; MiniMax request is flat per call. Real cost must be benchmarked against your own prompt patterns for a week before you decide.
Honest Weaknesses
- Ark Agent Plan: token unit price is 2~2.5× higher than the old Coding Plan; the 7.5× long-context multiplier is unfriendly to repo-dump-style prompting
- MiniMax Token Plan: models are all MiniMax-first-party — no Qwen / DeepSeek / GLM swap-in; video / music has per-day caps
- Bailian Token Plan (Team): ¥198 entry is steep for solo devs; no video/voice models, not suitable for multimedia workloads
Closing Thoughts
China’s AI subscription market is fragmenting from “selling tokens” into three distinct directions: selling Agent fuel / selling modalities / selling seats:
- Volcano Ark is betting on Agent toolchain + Doubao full stack
- MiniMax is betting on full-modal coverage
- Bailian is betting on enterprise multi-seat + multi-model aggregation
In the short term these three won’t fully substitute for each other. Heavy users will likely subscribe to two of them (a common combo: Ark Coding Plan for everyday text coding + MiniMax Token Plan for multimedia work). Run your real workflow against the entry tier for two weeks before committing to a main subscription.
Related Reading
Ready to pick your tool?
Check the full overview and find your perfect AI coding setup in 30 seconds.
View Full Overview →📖 Related Articles
5 China-Native Coding Plans Compared: 2026 Selection Guide
A comprehensive side-by-side comparison of Bailian, Volcengine Ark, MiniMax, Zhipu GLM, and Kimi — five major China-native AI coding subscription plans: pricing, quota mechanisms, model ecosystems, client compatibility, and selection advice.
Bailian Coding Plan vs Volcengine Ark Coding Plan: 2026 Deep Comparison
A comprehensive comparison of Alibaba Cloud Bailian and Volcengine Ark — two major China-native AI coding API plans: pricing, quota mechanisms, model ecosystems, client compatibility, and selection advice.
MiniMax Coding Plan vs Zhipu GLM Coding Plan: 2026 Deep Comparison
A comprehensive comparison of MiniMax and Zhipu AI's coding subscription plans: pricing, quota mechanisms, model ecosystems, bundled perks, and selection advice.
AI Coding Tool Monthly Cost Comparison 2026: Copilot, Cursor, Codex, Claude Code, and China Coding Plans
Compare monthly fees, quota models, China accessibility, and overage risk across GitHub Copilot, Cursor, OpenAI Codex, Claude Code, Volcengine Ark, MiniMax, Alibaba Bailian, and other AI coding setups.
📚 Related Guides
Volcano Ark Agent Plan Explained: The Industry's First Agent Subscription Bundle
On 2026-05-11 Volcano Ark launched Agent Plan, billed as the industry's first Agent subscription bundle. This guide breaks down its four pricing tiers, the AFP credits system, bundled multimodal models and Harness tools, and how it differs from Coding Plan.
China Coding API Roundup 2026: Ark vs Bailian vs MiniMax vs Zhipu vs DeepSeek
The most comprehensive 2026 comparison of Chinese AI coding API subscriptions: Volcengine Ark Lite ¥40/mo (¥9.9 first month), Alibaba Bailian ¥200, MiniMax ¥29, Zhipu GLM ¥49+, and DeepSeek pay-as-you-go. One big table, six scenarios, and a decision tree to find your fit in 30 seconds.