GitHub Copilot Switches to AI Credits Billing in June: Will You Pay More?
GitHub Copilot is replacing Premium Request Units with AI Credits token-based billing on June 1, 2026. Here's a breakdown of what each plan includes, what models cost, and whether your bill goes up or down.
GitHub Copilot is switching from Premium Request Units (PRUs) to AI Credits token-based billing on June 1, 2026. Plan prices stay the same, but the billing logic changes completely — and whether you end up paying more depends heavily on which models you use and how agentically you work. Let’s break it down.
The Change in One Table
| Old Model (until May 31) | New Model (from June 1) |
|---|---|
| Pro: 300 premium requests/month, overage $0.04/req | Pro: $10 in monthly AI Credits, overage billed per token |
| Pro+: 1,500 premium requests/month | Pro+: $39 in monthly AI Credits |
| Each “request” = one unit, regardless of token count | Charged by actual tokens × model rate |
Code completions and Next Edit Suggestions remain free across all plans — they never consume AI Credits.
Monthly AI Credits by Plan
| Plan | Monthly Price | Included AI Credits | USD Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Copilot Free | $0 | Limited | — |
| Copilot Pro | $10 | 1,000 Credits | $10 |
| Copilot Pro+ | $39 | 3,900 Credits | $39 |
| Copilot Business | $19/user | 1,900 Credits + 3,000 promo (Jun–Aug) | $19 |
| Copilot Enterprise | $39/user | 3,900 Credits + 7,000 promo (Jun–Aug) | $39 |
Conversion: 1 AI Credit = $0.01 USD. Once your monthly allotment runs out, you can set an overflow budget or simply stop until the next billing cycle.
What Consumes Credits vs. What’s Free
Always free (no credits consumed):
- Inline code completions
- Next Edit Suggestions
Consumes AI Credits:
- Copilot Chat
- Copilot Agent / Autopilot sessions
- Copilot CLI
- Copilot Cloud Agent
- Copilot Spaces & GitHub Spark
- Third-party Copilot Extensions
- Code Review (also consumes GitHub Actions minutes)
Model Token Pricing Table
Prices per 1 million tokens, converted to AI Credits (100 Credits = $1)
| Model | Input (credits/M) | Cached Input (credits/M) | Output (credits/M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 mini | 25 | 2.5 | 200 |
| Raptor mini | 25 | 2.5 | 200 |
| Grok Code Fast 1 (xAI) | 20 | 2 | 150 |
| Gemini 3 Flash | 50 | 5 | 300 |
| GPT-4.1 | 200 | 50 | 800 |
| GPT-5.2 | 175 | 17.5 | 1,400 |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | 125 | 12.5 | 1,000 |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 100 | 10 | 500 |
| GPT-5.4 | 250 | 25 | 1,500 |
| Claude Sonnet 4.x | 300 | 30 | 1,500 |
| GPT-5.5 | 500 | 50 | 3,000 |
| Claude Opus 4.x (Pro+ only) | 500 | 50 | 2,500 |
What Does a Typical Session Actually Cost?
Scenario A: Regular Chat
- Input: ~2,000 tokens (question + code context)
- Output: ~500 tokens (response)
| Model | Cost per chat (credits) | Sessions on Pro’s 1,000-credit budget |
|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 mini | 0.15 | ~6,600 |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0.45 | ~2,200 |
| Claude Sonnet 4.x | 1.35 | ~740 |
| Claude Opus 4.x | 2.25 | ~444 (Pro+ only) |
Scenario B: Agentic Coding Session
Agents read multiple files, so context balloons significantly:
- Input: ~15,000 tokens
- Output: ~3,000 tokens
| Model | Cost per agent task (credits) | Tasks on monthly budget |
|---|---|---|
| GPT-5 mini | 0.98 | ~1,020 (Pro) |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 3.0 | ~333 (Pro) |
| Claude Sonnet 4.x | 9.0 | ~111 (Pro) |
| Claude Opus 4.x | 15.0 | ~260 (Pro+, $39 budget) |
More Expensive or Cheaper Than Before?
It depends entirely on your model choice and session size:
Likely cheaper (light users):
- Primarily using GPT-5 mini or Grok Code Fast for daily chat
- Under the old model, 300 premium requests was a hard cap — the new model gives equivalent usage with credits left over
Likely more expensive (heavy agentic users):
- Running frequent Claude Sonnet or GPT-5.4 Agent sessions on large codebases
- Under the old model, 300 requests was a fixed ceiling. Under the new model, 111 Sonnet agent sessions already exhaust Pro’s entire $10 credit budget
- Bottom line: longer context + pricier models = faster credit burn
Community reaction: A vocal segment of developers complained the change means “you will get less, but pay the same price” — particularly those relying on long-context sessions in large repos. GitHub’s official position is that Copilot has evolved from a chat assistant into an agentic platform, and token-based billing better reflects the actual compute involved.
How to Control Your Spending
The new billing model introduces budget controls at three levels:
- Individual users: Set a monthly overflow cap in billing settings. Setting it to $0 stops usage entirely once credits are exhausted — no surprise charges.
- Organization / cost center: Admins can set per-user budgets across teams.
- Enterprise level: Centralized control across all seats.
Practical tips:
- Unsure about your usage? Set overflow cap to $0 for the first month and monitor actual consumption before enabling overages.
- Heavy agent user? Estimate: monthly agent sessions × credits per session = expected spend. Budget accordingly.
- Save credits: Swapping from Claude Sonnet to Gemini 3 Flash or GPT-5 mini for routine tasks cuts costs by 85%+ with minimal quality impact for simple queries.
Migration Timeline
| User Type | Migration Date |
|---|---|
| Monthly Pro / Pro+ | Auto-migrates June 1, 2026 |
| Annual Pro / Pro+ | Stays on current plan until annual renewal |
| Business / Enterprise | Switches June 1 (with promotional credits Jun–Aug) |
Recommendations by User Profile
| Profile | What to do |
|---|---|
| Light user (a few chats/day, cheap models) | Minimal impact — credits will be ample |
| Moderate user (daily chat + occasional agents) | Pro $10 should suffice; set overflow cap to $0–$5 |
| Heavy agentic user (Sonnet/Opus + large context) | Consider Pro+, or evaluate Cursor / Cline + direct API |
| JetBrains / deep GitHub integration user | Copilot remains the best fit; monitor monthly usage |
If the new billing pushes your costs up significantly, see our Claude Code budget alternatives guide or how to cut Cursor costs for alternative setups.
Sources: GitHub Copilot Official Blog · GitHub Docs: Models and Pricing · Verified: 2026-05-11
Frequently Asked Questions
Will Copilot's June billing change make me pay more?
Do code completions still consume Credits?
How do I avoid overage charges?
When do annual subscribers migrate?
📚 Keep Reading
📚 Related Guides
AI Coding Token Saving Guide: Spend Less, Hit Fewer Rate Limits
From what tokens are to 5 practical strategies, covering Cursor, Claude Code, Cline, Copilot, and more. Whether you're on a subscription or pay-as-you-go, you can apply these tips immediately.
Using GitHub Copilot from China: Access, AI Credits Billing, and Alternatives
An assessment of Copilot accessibility from China, the new AI Credits billing system explained, plus domestic alternatives for developers who need a smoother experience.
AI Coding Tool Rate Limits Explained: How to Avoid Getting Blocked Mid-Sprint
Why does Claude Code, Cursor, or Copilot hit rate limits right when you're busiest? Learn how each tool's limits work and 5 practical strategies to keep working without interruption.
📖 Related Comparisons
Best AI Coding Tools 2026: Mainstream Tools Reviewed & Ranked
A practical AI coding tools comparison for 2026, covering Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, Windsurf, and other mainstream tools across coding ability, pricing, flexibility, and more.
AI Coding Tool Monthly Cost Comparison 2026: Copilot, Cursor, Codex, Claude Code, and China Coding Plans
Compare monthly fees, quota models, China accessibility, and overage risk across GitHub Copilot, Cursor, OpenAI Codex, Claude Code, Volcengine Ark, MiniMax, Alibaba Bailian, and other AI coding setups.
8 Best GitHub Copilot Alternatives in 2026
Not satisfied with GitHub Copilot? These 8 alternatives offer stronger Agent capabilities, better pricing, more model choices, or better regional accessibility.
🔧 Tools in This Article
💰 Related money-saving plans
Based on the tools and APIs in this guide — get started for less.
Cline + 方舟 Coding Plan
性价比之王最具性价比的 Agent 方案。Cline 免费开源,Plan/Act 双模式,接方舟 API 国内直连。方舟提供 Lite / Pro 双层级套餐;新用户订阅入口自 2026-03-13 起改为每日 10:30 限量开放,支持 Doubao-Seed-Code/GLM-4.7/DeepSeek-V3.2/Kimi-K2-Thinking 等模型。
For: 预算有限的国内开发者 · 想自由选择模型的用户
Cline + 百炼 Coding Plan
千问生态首选阿里云百炼 Coding Plan 搭配 Cline 的千问生态方案。Cline 免费开源,接百炼 API 国内直连。当前新购仅开放 Pro 套餐,支持 Qwen3.5-Plus/Qwen3-Coder-Next/GLM-5/Kimi-K2.5 等 8 款模型自由切换。
For: 想用千问最新模型的用户 · VS Code 用户
🎁 Grab deals & free trials
Free quotas, first-month discounts, and sign-up links for tools & coding plans — kept up to date.
View all deals →